SEX WORK RESEARCH HUB
Menu

articles

Letter of Complaint from the Sex Work Research Hub to the Women's Equality Party

4/17/2018

5 Comments

 
13th April, 2018

To the Women’s Equality Party,

This is an official complaint from the Sex Work Research Hub to the Women’s Equality Party, regarding the recent conduct of the leader of the Women’s Equality Party, Sophie Walker.

The Sex Work Research Hub connects researchers and academics across a range of Universities and disciplines, working on sex work, sex working and sexual exploitation, around the world. We also connect with sex workers, sex work support projects and other stakeholders, such as healthcare providers, lawyers, police, policy makers, educationalists, youth and community workers, to support and develop research that produces new knowledge, critiques dominant discourses on sex work, as well as delivering tangible public benefit and impact.

We are deeply concerned with the recent online comments made by Sophie Walker around the issue of sex work, and how she has been engaging with sex workers on her personal Twitter account. As the leader of the Women’s Equality Party, Walker not only holds a position of significant power, but she acts as a mouthpiece for feminism today. Walker’s recent comments and articles have shown that she is very poorly informed about modern sex work and that her agenda is ideologically driven, rather than being informed by the sex worker voice or peer reviewed data.
 
The language that Walker uses ignores the preferred terminology of those in the sex industry, and shows that she has little respect for the autonomy and wishes of the sex work community. Using terms such as 'prostituted woman', conflating sex work with sex trafficking, and repeatedly referring to sex work as 'rape', reinforces the shame and stigma around sex work that sex worker rights groups work hard to challenge. 

Picture
Picture
For an advocate of women’s equality to call a woman in the sex industry a ‘pathetic’ ‘sex bot’ in a public Twitter exchange is not only deeply offensive, but we are concerned this reveals far deeper issues with Walker’s attitudes towards sex workers. We recognise that the tweet to which Walker responded was a personal attack, which cannot be condoned, but that does not justify Walker using her position of influence and authority to 'slut shame' another woman online. Walker should be listening to women in the sex industry, not dismissing them as 'pathetic', or shaming them as little more than 'sex bots'. 
Picture
Many sex workers have used social media to directly address Walker for her damaging views on their work, but she has refused to engage with any of them beyond tweeting sarcastic comments, even accusing one person of selfishly calling for decriminalisation at expense of exploited women.
Picture
We have also seen Walker claim in her Twitter thread that Women’s Equality Party spoke to ‘women who call themselves sex workers’. The language used here is truly shocking and adopts the position that sex workers are not only lying, but that the Women’s Equality Party simply knows better.  This is not equality, this is condescension. We would also like to ask who these women are that the Women’s Equality Party has spoken too, as we can confirm Walker did not get in touch with Sex Worker Advocacy and Resistance Movement, National Ugly Mugs, the English Collective of Prostitutes, or any member of the Sex Work Research Hub before making such claims.

These online comments come shortly after a blog article by Walker on ‘ending demand’ of prostitution, published with the Huffington Post (27/03/2018). Whilst we welcome debate around sex work and sex worker safety, this article is littered with misrepresented and debunked statistics, shaming language and blatantly ignored the considerable research that proves ‘end demand’ tactics cause significant harm to sex workers. Walker celebrates the Nordic Model of sex work in Ireland, but ignores the fact that under this system there has been a 54% increase in crime against sex workers, and violent crime is up by 77%.

Sophie Walker’s attacks upon sex workers, her refusal to engage with and listen to the people she claims to want to protect, and her poorly informed articles celebrating a legal system that leads to violence against women, have led us to question Walker’s suitability to lead your party.

Sex workers are a vulnerable social group, a position made significantly worse by prominent feminists publicly attacking and dehumanising them. Sex workers are as deserving of equality and respect within your party as any other woman. Their choices around employment, sex and bodily autonomy are as valid as any other woman’s.
​
We call for a public apology from Walker for her attacks upon sex workers, and ask for the Women’s Equality Party to meet with the leading sex worker rights groups to address these concerns as a matter of some urgency.


​
Signed:

Professor Teela Sanders, Criminology, SWRH Board Member, University of Leicester
Professor Nick Mai, Sociology, SWRH Board Member, Kingston University, London
Dr Pippa Grenfell, Assistant Professor, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Professor Maggie O'Neill, Sociology/ Criminology, SWRH Board Member, University of York
Professor Clarissa Smith, Sexual Cultures, University of Sunderland
Professor, Jane Scoular, SWRH Board Member, University of Strathclyde
Professor Alison Phipps, Professor of Gender Studies and Director of the Centre for Gender Studies, University of Sussex
Dr Rosie Campbell OBE, (University of Leicester) , Board Member, SWRH & Chair National Ugly Mugs
Dr. Heidi Hoefinger, Professor of Science, School of Liberal Arts, Berkeley College, New York
Dr Kate Brown, Lecturer in Social Policy and Crime, University of York
Dr PG Macioti, Kingston University, UK
Dr Nicola Smith, Senior Lecturer in Law, SWRH Board Member, University of Birmingham
Dr Lynzi Armstrong, Lecturer in Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington
Dr Laura Connelly, Lecturer in Criminology, University of Salford
Dr Kate Lister, Lecturer in History, SWRH Board Member, Leeds Trinity University
Eurydice Aroney, Senior Lecturer in Journalism, University of Technology Sydney
Dr Scarlett Redman, Sex Work Research Hub
Dr. Alison Jobe, Assistant Professor in Sociology and Criminology, Durham University
Camille Melissa, Doctoral Researcher
Raven Bowen, Doctoral Researcher, SWRH Board Member, University of York
Dara Howley, Masters in History Student (focussing on sex history), University College London
Rebecca Meiksin, Research Fellow and PhD Student, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Gaynor Trueman, North East Sex Work Forum
Max Morris, Doctoral Researcher, Durham University
Lilith Brouwers, Doctoral Researcher, University of Leeds
Evie Brill Paffard, Victorian Literature and Culture MA student (focussing on sex and sexuality in the Victorian era), University of York
Sam Geuens, Clinical Sexologist (MSc, MA, PEV) , PXL University College
Dr. Mary Laing, Senior Lecturer, Northumbria University
Dr. Emily Cooper, Lecturer in Human Geography, University of Central Lancashire
5 Comments
Mistress Ryder
4/21/2018 06:43:12 am

Ignoring the very people one purports to be helping, not allowing them a voice, is the height of arrogance and assumption. #sexworkiswork

Reply
Carol Leigh link
4/21/2018 10:02:38 am

Thanks all for this important work from the Sex Work Research Hub! This work is much needed. I have been thinking about the idea that "sex work is consensual and trafficking is not," which I read elsewhere, on a comment about this issue. At first I resisted this idea, because all work can be forced, and non consensual, and sex work is work. But after thinking and reading, I come to understand that there is an assumption in the terminology term "work," that work is consensual. The key is that there is an assumption, as with sex work. I believe that it makes sense to construct the terminology to reflect the terminology of work in general, so that there could be work in the field of sexual services, sex, commercial sex, that is less or more consensual. Perhaps some prefer not to use the term 'sex work' in such cases. I would also keep in mind the gradations and reasons behind the lack of choice in work in general. This is complicated, but I am concerned that STRICT linking of sex work to choice limits valuable analysis, especially intersectional analysis. The anti-trafficking framework (and especially language around "sex trafficking") itself is responsible for a great deal of oppression and confusion and part of it is this dualism.

Reply
Ms Tytania link
4/21/2018 12:09:10 pm

The WEP is a=not a party, but a hobby for bored bourgeois women who want to appear engaged. Is representatives have consistently ignored the reality of most women, claiming that benefits are not a feminist issue; that disability rights is not a feminist issue; their white, cis, upper middle class ivory tower feminism only represents them, and the WEP is a platform to flaunt their moralistic pearl-clutching in public.

Reply
Victor Field
5/2/2018 01:34:16 am

Tytania is likely right on the money....

Reply
piaarora link
4/10/2019 02:28:14 am

Thanks for sharing nice information with us. I like your post and all you share with us is up to date and quite informative, I would like to bookmark the page so I can come here again to read you, as you have done a wonderful job.
Welcome to Jungligirl Escorts Agency, I am a professional and new Independent escort agency offering high class and VIP Bangalore escorts to the discerning gentlemen of Bangalore.
<a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">Bangalore Escorts Agency</a> | <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">Bangalore Escorts Service</a>
| <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">escorts service in bangalore</a> | <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">bangalore female escorts</a>
| <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">bangalore escorts services</a> | <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">bangalore model escorts</a>
| <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">independent escorts in bangalore</a> | <a href="https://www.jungligirls.com/">sensual massage in bangalore</a>



Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2020
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

    LGBT+
    Academic
    Interveiws
Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Meet the Board
    • Membership
  • Student Sex Work Toolkit for Staff in Higher Education
  • Resources
  • SWRH Policy Briefings
  • Ethical Guidelines
  • Academic Articles
  • Interviews
  • Blog
  • News
    • Newsletters
    • Social Media >
      • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
    • Contact
    • Meet the Board
    • Membership
  • Student Sex Work Toolkit for Staff in Higher Education
  • Resources
  • SWRH Policy Briefings
  • Ethical Guidelines
  • Academic Articles
  • Interviews
  • Blog
  • News
    • Newsletters
    • Social Media >
      • Twitter